Original research

The State of Tracking Quality

We audit the tracking setup of thousands of public websites. Here is what the data says about how the web actually measures conversions — and where nearly everyone gets it wrong.

51/100
Median tracking score
303
Sites audited
91%
Fail Consent Mode v2

How sites score

0–19 (broken)
0
20–39 (poor)
1
40–59 (mixed)
168
60–79 (decent)
84
80–100 (healthy)
50

The checks most sites fail

Share of audited sites that fail or warn on each of the 13 checks.

CheckPassWarnFail
Consent on custom pixels0%0%100%
Consent Mode v29%0%91%
GA4 measurement ID41%0%59%
Purchase event carries revenue91%0%9%
Tracking on deep pages55%39%6%
Meta Pixel28%72%0%
TikTok Pixel13%87%0%
Single GA4 property85%15%0%
Consent banner33%67%0%
Duplicate GA4 event tags0%100%0%
GTM container35%65%0%
PII in URL100%0%0%
Google Ads conversion28%72%0%
Tracking script weight97%3%0%
GTM debug mode100%0%0%
HTTPS100%0%0%
DataLayer initialised34%66%0%

By platform

Shopify · 50 (17%)WordPress · 31 (10%)Webflow · 13 (4%)WooCommerce · 6 (2%)Wix · 2 (1%)Squarespace · 2 (1%)Unknown · 199 (66%)

See the full, live breakdown on the benchmarks dashboard.

Most-detected vendors

GA441%
GTM35%
Hotjar32%
Google Ads28%
Meta Pixel28%
Bing UET24%
Attentive13%
TikTok Pixel13%
Reddit12%
Shopify Analytics12%

Methodology

Figures are computed from the 303 most recent successful public audits in the TagEasy corpus. Each site is scored 0–100 across 13 tracking-quality checks (GA4, GTM, Consent Mode v2, PII exposure, pixel presence, duplicate properties, script weight, and more — see what the audit checks). Sites that block automated scanners are excluded.

Based on 303 scored audits — the most recent 5,000 in the corpus, recomputed hourly. Computed Sep 2, 2026, 06:25 AM UTC.

How does your site score?

Run the same 13-check audit on any URL — free, no signup, results in seconds.

Run the free auditor