Original research

The State of Tracking Quality

We audit the tracking setup of thousands of public websites. Here is what the data says about how the web actually measures conversions — and where nearly everyone gets it wrong.

49/100
Median tracking score
1,868
Sites audited
95%
Fail Consent Mode v2

How sites score

0–19 (broken)
240
20–39 (poor)
3
40–59 (mixed)
1024
60–79 (decent)
218
80–100 (healthy)
383

The checks most sites fail

Share of audited sites that fail or warn on each of the 13 checks.

CheckPassWarnFail
Page load0%0%100%
Consent Mode v25%0%95%
GA4 measurement ID35%0%65%
GTM debug mode99%0%1%
Meta Pixel22%78%0%
TikTok Pixel11%89%0%
Google Ads conversion25%75%0%
Consent banner33%67%0%
GTM container33%67%0%
PII in URL100%0%0%
Tracking script weight99%1%0%
HTTPS100%0%0%
Single GA4 property85%15%0%
DataLayer initialised25%75%0%

By platform

Shopify · 188 (10%)WordPress · 121 (6%)Webflow · 44 (2%)WooCommerce · 41 (2%)Wix · 6 (0%)Squarespace · 6 (0%)Unknown · 1462 (78%)

See the full, live breakdown on the benchmarks dashboard.

Most-detected vendors

GA431%
GTM29%
Hotjar28%
Google Ads22%
Meta Pixel19%
Bing UET16%
Reddit11%
LinkedIn Insight10%
TikTok Pixel9%
Shopify Analytics7%

Methodology

Figures are computed from the 1,868 most recent successful public audits in the TagEasy corpus. Each site is scored 0–100 across 13 tracking-quality checks (GA4, GTM, Consent Mode v2, PII exposure, pixel presence, duplicate properties, script weight, and more — see what the audit checks). Sites that block automated scanners are excluded. Updated daily.

How does your site score?

Run the same 13-check audit on any URL — free, no signup, results in seconds.

Run the free auditor